The scene is partioned into three areas that are main the standard view. The written text just report enables you to view the Similarity Report without having the document formatting.You are able to navigate towards the text only report by simply clicking the Report that is text-Only button the underside right associated with the document audience.You may even see the Similarity Report in A text-only report structure.Side By Side Comparison: a close view that displays a document’s match compared hand and hand using the source that is original through the content repositories.Match Breakdown: shows matches which can be obscured with a top source.All Sources: Allows a person to look at matches between your paper and a specifically chosen source when you look at the content repositories.Match Overview: (show greatest matches together): a listing of all certain aspects of the paper that have similarity to information into the chosen search repositories.The four modes for viewing a Similarity Report are: These modes permit you to view and sort the knowledge within the Similarity are accountable to most useful suit your requirements. The Document Viewer best site can be seen in four various modes.This breakdown determines the percentage of similarity between a distribution and content current when you look at the database for the text comparison device, iThenticate. Similarity Report The Similarity Report provides a broad similarity breakdown for every single submission to your iThenticate database. The Similarity Report additionally the Similarity Index Please contact the Pre Award office ( ) with any questions regarding the iThenticate process.Ithenticate at Caltech: Understanding Similarity Reports and Indexes Should a proposal be flagged by the 30% threshold, the responsibility and decision to retain the submission will ultimately rest with the investigator. Timeline and Responsibility While manuscripts or proposals may be submitted for iThenticate review at any time, the Office of Research Services will not introduce mandatory proposal review until a later date. To request your own iThenticate login please fill out this form. If the proposal contains greater than 30% matched text, the Pre Award administrator will highlight this to the investigator when sending the report by email, and offer a consultation to address whether to withdraw or continue the submission. Procedure To aid scholars/researchers and ensure compliance with research integrity, UMKC faculty, staff or students may submit their manuscript or proposal to the UMKC Pre Award Office ( ) at any time to receive a similarity iThenticate-generated report and/or UMKC Pre Award will, as part of their process for all proposal submissions, upload the proposal and provide the report to the investigator within 1-week of their proposal submission. The process is far from perfect, but given the rapid adoption of this and other plagiarism detection practices, this screening is one to which academics must adapt. Each agency or journal, sets their score threshold for what they consider questionable similarity if the threshold is reached, the proposal or manuscript undergoes alleged plagiarism review, may be outright rejected, and/or penalties assessed. The utility generates a similarity score, representing text that matches their database.